Catch hidden behavior failures
Find user trust loss, freshness gaps, tool misuse, and weak edge behavior before customers do.
Behavioral evidence for AI products
Evidpath runs controlled domain trials before launch, then writes judged traces and evidence your team can review, rerun, and compare.
Hidden failures
trust collapse, freshness gaps, tool misuseRerunnable evidence
fixed seeds, traces, reports, manifestsLaunch decisions
baseline vs candidate before releaseThe category shift
Unit tests and thresholds still matter. They just do not tell you which users lose trust, which queries miss intent, which agents misuse tools, or whether a candidate changed behavior in a risky slice.
Same input, same output. The test can be exact.
The average can pass while a user journey fails.
Client benefits
Evidpath gives teams a controlled way to find behavior failures, rerun the same coverage, compare release candidates, and leave a launch packet that can be reviewed by humans.
Find user trust loss, freshness gaps, tool misuse, and weak edge behavior before customers do.
Turn release concerns into repeatable domain runs with saved traces, judges, and rerunnable evidence.
Run baseline and candidate systems through comparable coverage before approving a change.
Give reviewers reports, JSON, trace ledgers, manifests, and domain-specific failure language.
evidpath audit --domain agents --scenario current-info-tool-use --driver-config-path ./driver_config.jsonRun path
Domain -> Coverage -> Judge -> Evidence
Each domain gives the run its target shape, scenario grammar, judge, and report language.
Domain products
Evidpath is the shared evidence engine. The domain product gives it the contract, scenario language, judge, and report vocabulary for a specific AI system.
Generated swarms most mature
Run repeatable user coverage against recommendation slates before release changes reach real users.
Failure language
Integration paths
native HTTP / schema-mapped HTTP / Python callable / Hugging Face adapter
Public audit and compare domain
Run repeatable query coverage against rankers to surface relevance, freshness, ambiguity, and zero-result risks.
Failure language
Integration paths
native HTTP / schema-mapped HTTP / Python callable
Public trajectory domain
Run repeatable task coverage against agents to evaluate tool use, grounding, refusal behavior, state, and latency.
Failure language
Integration paths
Python/LangGraph / OpenAI-compatible / Anthropic / MCP stdio / HTTP session
The method
Evidpath does not stop at a manual spot check. It builds a domain-shaped run, calls the target through the right integration path, judges completed traces, then writes artifacts a team can inspect and rerun.
evidpath audit --domain search --target-url http://127.0.0.1:8051 --scenario time-sensitive-query
Coverage model
A swarm is coverage with memory: seeded actors, scenarios, journeys, tasks, and saved plans that can be rerun when a target changes. Generated coverage is currently strongest for the recommender domain.
Question
what could fail before launch?
Domain
recommender, search, or agents
Swarm
users, queries, or tasks
Run plan
seeded and replayable
domain-shaped
artifact-backed
Launch evidence
Reports should name the domain, the run, the trace, the concern, and the files behind the conclusion. That is the difference between “we tried it” and repeatable launch review.
Output guideExecutive summary
release question answered with trace-backed evidence
Domain finding
trust collapse, freshness gap, or tool-use regression
Trace ledger
seeded user/task interactions preserved step by step
Semantic advisory
optional explanation sidecar, non-gating
Regression summary
baseline -> candidate with pass, warn, or fail
Artifact manifest
environment, inputs, outputs, and content hashes
Platform shape
The platform gives every domain the same repeatable run engine, trace ledger, regression workflow, and artifact model. The domain product gives each customer the scenarios, contract, judge, and failure language that match the system they ship.
Generated swarm planning is most mature for recommenders today and is expanding across search and agent domains.
Shared platform capabilities
Evidence engine
Seeds, planning, execution
Domain product
Contract, scenarios, judge
Target run
HTTP, Python, protocol driver
Evidence
Traces, reports, manifests
Release
Compare, policy, review
Platform flow
Repeatable behavior trials
Fixed seeds, scenarios, tasks, and reruns make behavior reviewable instead of anecdotal.
Domain product packs
Each domain owns target shape, scenario grammar, judge, metrics, and failure language.
Generated coverage where mature
Recommender briefs can become structured scenarios, populations, swarms, and reusable run plans.
Launch comparison
Compare runs, regression policy, saved plans, and CI-ready outputs turn testing into release review.
Product manual
The docs explain the swarm model after the buyer story is clear: choose a domain product, pick an integration path, run workflows, and read the evidence packet.
Domain pilot
Bring the target. We will help choose the domain product, implementation path, and first release question to turn into trace-backed evidence.